None of them was a citizen of a nation at war with the u. As i pointed out last week, and as legal scholar john yoo did earlier this week in. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit no. Supreme court on june 12, 2008, held that the military commissions act mca of 2006, which barred foreign nationals held by the united states as enemy combatants from challenging their detentions in u. A brief summary of the supreme court case boumediene v. Boumediene was one of several aliens captured at various battlefields over the world, from afghanistan to bosnia or gambia, who were then held at guantanamo bay naval station. Im not siding with either boumediene or bush in this case. Feb 15, 2014 the truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation dr devra davis duration.
Why was lakhdar boumediene, in the boumediene v bush case. The case was a writ of habeas corpus submission made in a civilian court of the united states on behalf of lakhdar boumediene, a naturalized citizen of bosnia and herzegovina, held at guantanamo for six years. The question, then, is whether by attempting to eliminate all federal court jurisdiction to consider petitions for writs of habeas corpus, congress has overstepped the boundary established by the suspension clause. United states, brought by ccr with cocounsel, challenged all of these attempts to undermine the supreme courts ruling in rasul. Boumediene filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging violations of the constitutions due process clause, various statutes and treaties, the common law, and international law. The court repudiated the fundamental legal basis for the bush administrations strategy of housing prisoners at the united states naval base in cuba. By january 2002 camp xray opened at the united states naval base in guantanamo bay, cuba. Supreme court of the united states syllabus boumediene et al. Circuit decision which had held that the judiciary. Bush was a 54 supreme court decision with the majority opinion written by justice kennedy. In the supreme court case of boumediene v bush, the court found that there was a violation of the suspension clause of habeas corpus in the us constitution. In deciding the constitutional questions now presented we must determine whether petitioners are barred from seeking the writ or invoking the protections of the suspension clause either because of their status, i. The bush administration declared that since the naval base is not on u.
Oxford university press usa publishes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, childrens books, business books, dictionaries, reference books, journals, text books and more. By a vote of 54, the court held that in boumediene v. Al odah, next friend of fawzi khalid abdullah fahad al odah, et al. It is a rejection of the alarmist view that our fragile geopolitical position requires abandoning our.
The case revolves around a man named lakhdar boumediene who was a naturalized citizen of bosnia. Aliens classified as enemy combatants in custody at guantanamo bay request the court to determine whether they have the right to file a writ for habeas corpus, which is a constitutional privilege not revoked except if the suspension clause is in effect. Boumediene and other guantanamo bay detainees filed for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge their confinement conditions. Bush,2 the supreme court held that foreign detainees at the guantanamo bay naval base in cuba have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus and that such a privilege cannot be withdrawn except in con. Boumediene was the fifth in a series of cases to reach the court concerning the detention of prisoners held as a result of the united states response to the 2001 attacks by the terrorist group al qaeda. I didnt think that was appropriate when the cases were consolidated, first. As i pointed out last week, and as legal scholar john yoo did earlier this week in the wall street journal, the. The courts 63 judgment on june 28, 2004, reversed a d. Sharon bradford franklin the constitution project 1025 vermont ave. N he supreme court of the united states rutherford institute.
The case was a writ of habeas corpus submission made in a civilian court of the united states on behalf of lakhdar boumediene, a naturalized citizen of bosnia and herzegovina, held. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. United states in february 2002, the center for constitutional rights and our cocounsel brought the first habeas case in federal court on behalf of detainees held at guantanamo. The district court judge granted the governments motion to have all of the claims dismissed on the ground that boumediene, as an alien detained at an. On 8 july 2004, lakhdar boumediene, al odah and others filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after the supreme courts ruling in rasul v. Sessions it certainly was not my intent, when i voted for the dta, to exempt all of the pending guantanamo lawsuits from the provisions of that act. Section 7 of the mca fixes this feature of the dta and ensures that there is no. Bush, in which the supreme court affirmed the detainees rights to challenge the legality of their detention. At the commencement of the war on terror president george w. Im simply curious as to how this ruling was established.
United states, decided june 12, 2008, the supreme court held in a 54 opinion that aliens. Mca writ of habeas corpus lakhdar boumediene and the five other algerians petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus which means to challenge the legality of their imprisonment but it was denied because they were not u. The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation dr devra davis duration. A provision of the military commissions act mca prevented unlawful alien detainees from challenging confinement conditions. Submitted by david drumm nal, guest blogger boumediene v. Bush, president of the united states, et al khaled a. Ive been witness to the character of the people of america, who have shown. Bush is not a license to allow hardened terrorists to go free. Bush, united states supreme court, 2008 case summary for boumediene v. Bush 2008, giving the latter preference in name order, and their june 2008 applies to all the plaintiffs, but there is a separate article under that title, alodah v. Guantanamo detainees right to habeas corpus summary in the consolidated cases of boumediene v. Those who cherish the united states historical adherence to the rule of law myself included were delighted to hear that the us supreme court ruled on thursday, in the case of boumediene v. The administr ation of pr esident george w bush 20 01 20 09.
Boumediene was the fifth in a series of cases to reach the court concerning the detention of prisoners held as a result of the united states response to the 2001 attacks by the. The administration of president george bush thought that because gitmo the prison is not on us soil that the prisoners would fall outside of the united states law and jurisdiction. Constitution a step towards judicial cosmopolitanism. Bush was a writ of habeas corpus that was made in a civilian court of the united states on behalf of lakhdar boumedienea naturalized citizen of bosnia and herzegovina, who was held in military detention by the united states at guantanamo bay detention camps in cuba. Argued december 5, 2007decided june 12, 2008 in the authorization for use of military force aumf, congress empowered the president to use all necessary and.
173 453 590 1124 1513 971 941 1328 1205 701 370 334 405 881 1328 967 460 829 775 776 239 1224 1331 1291 899 1224 70 1179 1287 456 1076 939 513 1254 637 466 1372